Naturalism The Open Boat To Build A Fire English Literature Essay

Naturalism The Open Boat To cook A Fire English Literature EssayNaturalism is a piss of literature that strives to achieve the reproduction of the hu hu reality beings being characters with the involve custodyts of environment, heredity, instinct, chance, and also the present affable conditions of the particular time in which the work was written. American literary realism is closely associated with literary realism, and is heavily influenced by determinism which states that a persons behaviors are swayed by heredity and environment. (http//www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/naturalism) In these short stories authors Stephen Crane and Jack capital of the United Kingdom try to render their characters accurately through their characters internal thoughts and actions influenced by the preoccupied forces of character. Instead of the characters having free reign in the short stories, the naturalist authors portray the characters action and thoughts being heavily influenced by uncont rollable environmental forces. The characters in the authors short stories struggle to survive a enlightenst an inhu humankind and an insensitive universe. The authors strive to gain meanings within their own writings of the experience, which in return establishes authenticity of the characters human endeavor. In Stephen Cranes short story, The Open Boat, Crane writes of four mens thoughts and actions while chip to survive against the brutal forces of the open sea. Crane reveals mans conflicts with an indifferent nature that isnt needfully concerned with human actions and humanity desire to live. As the moon falls, and the solarize begins to beam the light of day the men began to postponement the full aspects of their situation. As the men look ashore for safety, the four conclave members are devoted to mistakes and confusion on thoughts of safely making it ashore. The correspondent is presented to readers as inquisitive, remaining to know the reason for the situation he look s to be trapped in. The construct is supposems to be almost light-hearted and sure of life. The captain is everlastingly attempt to fix a succeederful plan for bringing his crew successfully ashore. The oil well is presented as the most composed, and also most skeptical of there success of adjoining the safety of land. Crane develops the brotherhood of the four men crew as an opposing force against the destructive and indifferent forces of the ea surrounding them. The gentleman around the four men battling against the seas harsh nature is dramatically and constantly referred as indifferent to their attempts at humane survival. The pay off states he believes that they pass on be saved by people ashore, who leave recognize the risk of infection theyre in, and send a rescue party to save them. Cook, remarked the captain, there dont seem to be any signs of life well-nigh your ho single-valued function of refugee. No, replied the cook. Funny the dont see us(pg.191.ln.59-60) Crane seems to be suggesting the uncertainties of life that we believe in things not realistically possible and hope for things not there. True to the naturalistic focalisation of literature, the men almost never seem to be free of the grasp of the menacing sea around them. Recognizing that they are un belike to be rescued the captain plans bring the boat into the shore themselves. As they come go on to shore, fierce waves force all four men come forward of the boat.Only the tank ship does not survive. Crane suggests that this life and d carry offh struggle with the ocean must(prenominal) demand some price. In this tale, the price to be paid for battling against nature and emerging victorious is that one man must die. Crane seems to pick out the oiler as the sacrificial lamb since he is the least hail-fellow-well-met of the crew and the closest to living as if dead when he was alive. To skirmish the sea a man must be willing to get around his all and choose life.Crane ends his extraordinary tale with the same nasty elegance with which it began. None of the men may bugger off known the tinge of the sky as they sat in the dinghy for hours tossed on the sea, plainly they intimately learned the colors of the sea. the captain, the cook and the correspondent know that they set about acquired new knowledge. They have survived to become interpreters of the sea, its sounds, rhythms and cruelties. The oiler has vanished but the cheerful cook was able to float ashore with a lazy grace desiring to eat another slice of the pie of life. Nature is always pushing man to his limits. When man heeds the warning signs that nature has to offer and those warnings of other men, he is most likely to conquer nature. When he ignores these warnings, nature is sure to defeat man. To build a fire is a prime example of this scenario. In the short story, To Build a Fire by Jack capital of the United Kingdom, an inexperienced traveler in the Yukon travels alone with his mark, even though it is ill advised to do so. The man is unattackable and smart but nature humbled him during his quest to reach his friends. The mans inexperience with traveling in the cold subzero temperatures doomed him from the beginning, but his strong focus under extreme pressure and his keen sense of ceremony are what allows him to survive as long as he did. The ignorance of the old-timers rowing of wisdom slowly haunts him and catches up with him in the end. The mans disregard for natures power is his end during his excursion.Although the mans inexperience is his demise, he has very keen observing skills and strong counseling abilities. London writes, he was keenly observant, and he noticed the changes in the creek, the curves and bends and timber-jams, and always he sharply noted where he placed his feet.(Pg.117. .2,ln.1) The train, on the other hand, although guided by his learned behavior still has its instincts. The dog follows the man throughout the ill fated move, b ut after the man dies he relies on his instincts to survive the brutal forces of nature on the journey through the Yukon. Then it turned and trotted up the trail in the direction of the camp it knew, where there were other food providers and fire providers (129). London chose to use nature as the antagonist, a force working against the main characters will to survive. Very similar to the use of the environment in Stephen Cranes The Open Boat. London accomplishes his personification in the story by giving the environment many a(prenominal) humane characteristics. He had to accept the inevitable. Not only did he have to accept death, he had to acknowledge that the Old-Timer was right when warning him about traveling alone. While the man was dying, he was angry at the dog because of its natural warmth, instincts that he had, and the survival skills that the dog used. Those were the elements that the man lacked. It was a violate that the protagonist had to suffer and die in order to f ind out that mans frail body cannot withstand natures harsh elements in spite of his over-confident, mental strength.Naturalistic writers Stephen Crane and Jack London focus on qualities of men usually associated with the heroic or adventurous, acts of violence, bodily strength, and desperate moments usually inclined with acts of survival. The authors seek not only to reproduce stories of real life, but journey into the inner thoughts and feelings of the characters in their stories. The stories deal with the raw and unpleasant experiences while struggling for survival which helps with the understanding of the intermingling in life of the controlling forces of nature and various(prenominal) worth, without dehumanizing their characters.Beaver, Harold. Realism and Naturalism in Nineteenth-Century American Literature.Modern Language go off83.2 (1988) 423-424.Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 31 Oct. 2010.