Abortion - Man Cant Be Rightly Disposed of by Man :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Abortion - human being Cant Be Rightly Disposed of by Man Temporal support lived in this world is not identified with the person. The person possesses as his own a level of living that is more profound and that cannot end. Bodily life is a fundamental good, here below it is the correct for all other goods. save there are higher values for which it could be legitimate or even necessary to be willing to expose oneself to the risk of losing visible life. In a inn of persons the common good is for each soul an end which he must serve and to which he must subsidiary his particular interest. But it is not his last end and, from this point of view, it is society which is at the service of the person, because the person will not fulfill his constituent except in God. The person can be definitively subordinated only to God. Man can never be treated simply as a means to be disposed of in order to obtain a higher end. In regard to the mutual rights and duties of the person and of society, it belongs to moral article of belief to enlighten consciences it belongs to the law to specify and organize external behavior. There is simply a certain number of rights which society is not in a position to grant since these rights precede society but society has the choke to preserve and to enforce them. These are the greater part of those which are straight off called human rights and which our age boasts of having formulated. The first right of the human person is his life. He has other goods and some are more precious, but this one is fundamental-- the condition of all the others. Hence it must be protected above all others. It does not belong to society, nor does it belong to public authority in both form to recognize this right for some and not for others all favouritism is evil, whether it be founded on race, sex, color or religion. It is not recognition by another that constitutes this right. This right is antecedent to its recognition it demands recognitio n and it is strictly partial to refuse it. Any discrimination based on the various stages of life is no more justified than any other discrimination. The right to life remains complete in an old person, even one greatly weakened it is not lost by one who is incurably sick.